Adult Family Estrangement: Boundaries, Cut-Off, Grief, and the Possibility of Repair

Narrative Review. This page provides the verified citation, abstract, and full-text PDF for the journal article.

Clinical boundary: Reconciliation is not a treatment requirement. Contact decisions require individualized assessment of abuse, coercion, stalking, discrimination, dependence, and practical safety.

Publication Details

Author: Christian Jonathan Haverkampf
Journal: The Journal of Psychiatry Psychotherapy and Communication
Publication date: 2023-06-30
Volume, issue, pages: 12(2), 51–60
Article type: Narrative Review

Recommended citation: Haverkampf, C. J. (2023). Adult Family Estrangement: Boundaries, Cut-Off, Grief, and the Possibility of Repair. The Journal of Psychiatry Psychotherapy and Communication, 12(2), 51–60.

Abstract

Adult family estrangement is neither one event nor one moral category. Contact may narrow gradually, stop after a crisis, recur intermittently, or remain outwardly cordial while intimacy disappears. For some adult children or parents, distance protects against abuse, coercion, discrimination, or repeated violation; for others it follows chronic conflict, incompatible expectations, divided loyalties, or an impulsive rupture that later feels open to repair. This narrative clinical review considers evidence available through 30 May 2023. It brings adult-child and parent perspectives into the same formulation without treating their accounts as interchangeable or diagnosing an absent relative. Research remains limited by convenience samples, unmatched family members, retrospective narratives, cultural imbalance, and few controlled intervention studies. Even so, it clarifies recurring processes: discrepant causal stories, repeated distancing, stigma, ambiguous loss, family-system effects, and structural differences by gender, race, sexuality, migration, and material dependence. Psychotherapy can help a present client describe behavior precisely, assess safety, grieve what is unavailable, set workable boundaries, and choose among continued distance, limited contact, a negotiated attempt at repair, or renewed separation. Reconciliation is a possibility, not a treatment requirement. Clinicians serve clients best by widening choice while refusing both compulsory family loyalty and reflexive endorsement of permanent cut-off.

Keywords

family estrangement; adult children; parents; boundaries; ambiguous loss; reconciliation

Full Text

Open the full-text PDF

The PDF is searchable and preserves the journal layout and pagination used in the citation.

Related Information

Health Information and Safety

This journal article is educational and research-oriented. It is not a personal diagnosis, treatment plan, medication instruction, crisis service, or substitute for assessment by a suitably qualified clinician who knows the person’s circumstances.

Do not start, stop, or change medication or another treatment solely because of information on this page. New, severe, persistent, or worsening symptoms, or uncertainty about risk, require individual professional assessment.

If there is immediate danger or a risk of harm, contact local emergency services or urgent support. In Ireland, see:

Website copy first made available on 26 August 2026. The journal citation retains the article’s issue date.